If they had these rules when I was tearing up the south side of Salem,OR I doubt I'd have made it out of seventh grade.
With that said, a few whacks on the head from the Code Book would have done me some good.
My advise to anyone who does not agree with the Code of Conduct currently in place, too strict or too lax, should get involved to try and change them to your satisfaction.
Posts: 11329 | Location: western suburbs of Chicago | Registered: June 07, 2005
Does everyone see the COC being universally applied in your school, or do you see some random application based on who the violator(s) happens to be? Are there schools out there that do NOT have an athletic code?
Posts: 617 | Location: Illinois | Registered: February 25, 2006
If they would have had these rules in my HS we would have had zero extra curricular activities. Kinda hard to play sports with only 3 kids available at the most. 2 cheerleaders, maybe, 5 people in band, no student government, no chess club. Every HS party had alcohol and/or drugs. I am not saying it is right, but we survived and that was how it was in the 80's at my home town. Maybe that is why the rules are so strict now. Those party kids are now the parents.
Hustle never has a bad day.
Posts: 1116 | Location: Phoenix AZ | Registered: May 02, 2007
The District proudly encourages and supports students who elect to represent the school in extracurricular and/or co-curricular activities. The District believes in the valuable results of mental, social and physical development of the student body. Students who participate in extracurricular and/or co-curricular activities represent The District year round. As such, participation is a privilege, not a right and all student representatives of The District activities must adhere to the following rules and regulations, seven days a week, twelve months a year, whether or not school is in session as a condition of participation. The following requirements, procedures and consequences relate to participation and eligibility in extracurricular and/or co-curricular activities only and do not preclude the imposition of sanctions up to and including suspension and/or expulsion from school as outlined in the student discipline code where appropriate.
PREREQUISITE REQUIREMENTS
Any student who intends to participate and/ or actively participate in any extracurricular and/or co-curricular activity on behalf of The District must: 1. Submit a signed permission form by the student’s parent and/or guardian consenting to participating in an extracurricular and/or co-curricular activity, prior to the student’s first extracurricular and/or co-curricular activity of the school year. 2. Agree to abide by all rules and regulations of the Illinois High School Association and all rules and policies contained in the The District Parent-Student Handbook. 3. Attend a Code of Conduct seminar with a parent and/or guardian prior to the student’s first extracurricular and/or co-curricular contest/activity. 4. Sign a Code of Conduct contract. Attendance at school is required for a half a day or more to be eligible to participate in that day’s extracurricular and/or co-curricular activity. An absence on the last day of the school week will not preclude participation in a weekend activity. Emergencies and prearranged absences will not be considered absences.
PROCEDURE
Procedures to follow related to Code of Conduct issues: 1. An investigation will be initiated. 2. Prior to the decision to impose any penalty, the student-offender will be informed of the alleged violation and afforded an opportunity to make any statement on his/her behalf. 3. If a code of conduct violation has been determined: • Contact parents/guardian to set a meeting date with the student, parent and school officials to discuss the code of conduct violation. • School Officials/Parents may opt to do a phone conference in lieu of a face-to-face meeting. • This meeting must occur within 24 hours of a determination of the violation, when practicable, or the next school day following the determination of the violation. • If the parent/guardian is unable to meet within this time frame, the penalty will be imposed pending a later-scheduled meeting. 4. A follow-up letter will be sent to the student and parents regarding violation/ consequences, and notifying them of their right of a review of the penalty with the school building principal. 5. The right to review does not postpone the penalty imposition. The decision of the school building principal shall be final and is not subject to further review. 6. Penalties imposed pursuant to this Code of Conduct relate to the student’s eligibility to participate in The District extracurricular and/or co-curricular activities only and does not preclude the imposition of penalties for violations of The District Parent-Student Handbook rules and policies where appropriate. Penalties imposed for rule violations conducted in the course of co-curricular activity shall not be in the form of grade punishment. 7. Where a penalty is imposed, the student- offender will be removed from a leadership position (i.e. officer of the Student Council, leadership with any school-sponsored club or activity, any class officer position, and any leadership on any athletic team) in any extracurricular and/or co-curricular for the duration of the season/ activity.
PROHIBITED CONDUCT
No The District student participating in any extracurricular and/or co-curricular activity shall: 1. Possess, use, distribute or sell, or attempt to possess, use, distribute or sell, drugs, any substance represented to be a drug, controlled substances, drug paraphernalia, alcohol, tobacco and/or tobacco products. 2. Knowingly remain in the immediate presence of any person who is illegally using, possessing, distributing or selling drugs, any substance represented to be a drug, controlled substance, cannabis, drug paraphernalia, or alcohol, unless the student could not leave the person’s presence without endangering himself/ herself or others. 3. Commit and/or attempt to commit, and/or knowingly remain within the presence of one who commits and/or attempts to commit the offense of hazing, theft, assault, vandalism, illegal use of a weapon, or any other offense, which may be punishable by a court of law. 4. Use inappropriate, vulgar, lewd, indecent and/or derogatory language while representing the school at an extracurricular or co-curricular event. 5. Misuse school buildings, facilities and/or equipment. 6. Commit acts, which would bring disrepute to the extracurricular program in which the student is a participant. 7. Fail to abide by any other The District rule and/or policy as identified in the The District Parent-Student Handbook*** and/or the rules and regulations of the Illinois High School Association.
***21 other pages***
CONSEQUENCES
In General. Failure to abide by any provision contained in this Code of Conduct may result in temporary suspension from the activity; disqualification from the activity for the remainder of the season and/or the school year; temporary suspension and/or disqualification from any and/or all extracurricular and/or co-curricular activities; or permanent disqualification from participating in any The District extracurricular and/or co-curricular student activity programs for the remainder of the student’s high school career. Students involved in clubs and/or activities that do not compete or perform will be subject to consequences set forth in the by-laws of their club/activity.
Tobacco, Drug, Alcohol or Other Prohibited Substances
a. First Offense Suspension from extracurricular and/or co-curricular activities for the equivalent of one complete season. To complete the terms of the suspension, the studentoffender may be disqualified from more than one activity and may cover more than one school year. In lieu of suspension for one complete season, the student will be suspended from the activity for not less than 20% of the IHSA season limitations for athletic contests (Sec 5.00 IHSA Sports Season By-Laws) and/or scheduled performances and/or scheduled activity contests, if the student and parent or guardian attend an educational substance abuse program approved by the school district. Written proof of scheduled appointment dates at the program is required before the student will be deemed eligible to resume participation in the student activity. Failure to complete the program as scheduled may result in further discipline. During the time of contest/performance suspension, the student will be required to attend and participate in all practices. The student will not be allowed to dress or be at a contest/performance as a member of the team until the length of the suspension has been satisfied.
b. Second Offense
Suspension from extracurricular and/or co-curricular activities for the equivalent of one complete season. To complete the terms of the suspension, the studentoffender may be disqualified from more than one activity and may cover more than one school year. In lieu of suspension for one complete season, the student will be suspended from the activity for not less than 50% of the IHSA season limitations for athletic contests (Sec 5.00 IHSA Sports Season By-Laws) and/or scheduled performances and/or scheduled scheduled activity contests if the student and parent or guardian attend an educational substance abuse program approved by the school district. Written proof of scheduled appointment dates at the program and attendance at a meeting with a The District student counselor and/or school administrator are required before the student will be deemed eligible to resume participation in the student activity. Failure to complete the program as scheduled may result in further discipline. During the time of contest/performance suspension, the student will be required to attend and participate in all practices. The student will not be allowed to dress or be at a contest/performance as a member of the team until the length of the suspension has been satisfied. c. Third Offense Permanent suspension from participating in activities for the remainder of the student’s high school career. It is recommended that a meeting be held between the student, the student’s parent or guardian, and a The District counselor/ administrator to discuss outside resources where the student can obtain professional help or counseling.
VOLUNTARY ADMISSION
A voluntary admission shall occur when a parent and/or student initiates communication and admission with a certified employee of the school district before the student is arrested, detained, confronted, or apprehended by any law enforcement personnel, school personnel, other governmental personnel or a private citizen, or before a school investigation has begun. This communication and admission must occur before the student returns to school or school related function/activity. Under this circumstance, a voluntary admission will count as a first or second offense and the student will not be subject to consequences of suspension. If the offense involves drugs, alcohol, or other prohibited substances, the student will be required to attend an educational substance abuse program that has been approved by the school district. The purpose of this provision is to allow a student to seek help. Voluntary admission may NOT be used by a student if the rule infraction is already known by the school. Voluntary admission may be used by the student only one time during the student’s high school career and cannot be used on a third offense. The Code of Conduct will be in continuous effect from the date that it is signed until the student graduates, subject to any revisions imposed by The District.
Posts: 929 | Location: The Sticks. | Registered: October 19, 2004
Originally posted by Tuzigoot: As such, participation is a privilege, not a right and all student representatives of The District activities must adhere to the following rules and regulations, seven days a week, twelve months a year, whether or not school is in session as a condition of participation.
School districts essentially took these rights from people. They claim privilege, which we granted them by allowing them to take those rights from us.
This is a perfect example of the "political land grab" that I referred to in another post. Politicians take rights from us, and as long as we don't scream too much or too loud, they keep them.
No law ever gave schools the right to be judge/jury/executioner on items outside the school, we did that by apathetically shrugging our shoulders in blind agreement to their assessment that "it's for the good of the kids".
It is wrong, and not representative of the people or the ideals this country is founded on. Sitting idly by while others take from you rights that others have fought and died to protect is disgraceful.
I have often wondered if the people that steal those rights from others, have ever sat in a fox hole, or behind a tree, watching brave men fall in service to their country? Have they ever, in spite of bone chilling fear, continued to fight on and risk it all? Have they ever looked their buddy in they eye and said, "let's go, let's get the job done", and then moved out, advancing under fire? I wonder that if they understood the dear prices paid for those rights, whether they would be so quick to sneak those rights away like thieves in the night, by writing them into policies quietly and hoping no one notices.
I wonder if they understand how precious the rights we are granted by our constitution really are?
I wonder how many here even understand that and are willing to stand up for them?
Pray not for lighter burdens, but for stronger backs.
Posts: 2965 | Location: il | Registered: November 15, 2006
I'm with CPLZ. This is nuts. I hadn't seen one before. I can honestly say that all it is doing is making liars out of a lot of kids. How many go to concerts? You are now ineligible. How many go to ball games? Off the team. It is way too broad and could get a kid kicked off the team for any reason if they wanted to do it.
Hustle never has a bad day.
Posts: 1116 | Location: Phoenix AZ | Registered: May 02, 2007
Originally posted by itsrosy: CPLZ, you're so spot on it's beautiful. If you ever decide to run for office you've got my vote.
Can we get your signature on that rosy?
My biggest problem with these Codes of Conduct is the double standard which so often occurs. The high school administrators in that other thread did not apply a double standard and that is why I respect them.
Posts: 11329 | Location: western suburbs of Chicago | Registered: June 07, 2005
As I re-read the above post I'm most struck by the point that "sitting idly by while others take from you rights that others have fought and died to protect is disgraceful".
Woody, you've got my John Hancock. Send me a $20, I'll sign it and mail it back to you. Yeah sure!
I agree with you 110% CPLZ on the erosion of personal freedoms and rights - the stuff that's going on right now in this country is more than just a little frightening. But that's another conversation for another time.
So maybe this conversation should really focus on whether it's a right or a privilege to participate in a school sport. Here's how I see it... A RIGHT means that everyone gets to do it. In this case, every one has a right to TRYOUT for the team, but actually PLAYING is a privilege granted to those who are 1. deemed good enough and 2. agree to abide by the rules of participation. Reasonable people can disagree about what those rules should be (or even who's good enough to actually be on the team - but the PRIVILEGE of picking the team falls to a select few) but saying that everyone has a RIGHT to be on the team is not, in my mind, an accurate assessment of the situation. Kids have the RIGHT to attend a public school (as long as they don't do anything to forfeit that right) but that doesn't give them the RIGHT to be in the school band if they've never taken the time to learn to play an instrument. That's a privilege earned by those who have put in the time and agree to follow the rules associated with participation in that activity.
I think you're agreeing that the right is reserved for those who are chosen, but the disagreement comes on the second point... the scope of the rules of participation.
So is it a right that is granted to all? Or a privilege that one earns? Does anybody see it like I do? Or did I miss the mark?
Posts: 617 | Location: Illinois | Registered: February 25, 2006
I agree that in general our rights are eroding. Off point but....the same folks who were worried about the rights of suspected terrorists aren't all concerned about the rights of law abiding US Citizens.
OK back on point....A few years ago a HS athlete I know was busted for pot. As per the code, he was suspended.....IMHO wrongly because pot (noted as a drug) does not allow for a second chance as far a suspension goes. The drinkers get a better deal, they get a second chance. I think he should have gotten a second chance (alcohol abuse by kids is no better than smoking pot). He did go to court along with a heavy hitting legal team and get off on the misdemeanor charge, but of course it had no bearing on the code violation, nor should it have. His parents also challenged the school's decision as well but did not prevail as the school's process did not allow for legal wrangling as the court did. I also believe that the family took legal action against the school but the judge threw it out.
Schools need to be empowered to impose discipline. IMHO, even if there was no code, coaches should be responsible for such action and hopefull they would expect the same behavior the code does. Unfortunatly that would put them on the spot with a kid they needed to have to win.
Since playing on a team or involving yourself in another extra-curricular activity is completely voluntary I think there should be no problem expecting certain behavior of those representing the team, school and community. I think we can all agree on that on some level. Supposing it is something much worse....dealing heroin, raping someone, robbing a bank. Are you going to argue that a school has no right to impose a penalty on that kid who is on the team? Big difference between that and being at a party, but I'm just challenging those who think the school has no right to impose such penalties.
Maybe it is arguable where the line should be drawn, but it seems obvious that the principle is reasonable.
Again, the rules are put right in front of them ahead of time.
That code posted by Tuzi was probably that long because of challenges by parents in the past making the code as legally complex as the US Penal Code.
Posts: 2341 | Location: Chicago Il USA | Registered: February 13, 2004
FastballDad, The AP course is voluntary and if you are good at it it may get you into a school that you would normally not qualify for or be able to afford(scholly). Baseball, dance, tennis, whatever can get you the same thing.
They are all extra services. None of them are mandatory.
Hustle never has a bad day.
Posts: 1116 | Location: Phoenix AZ | Registered: May 02, 2007
The school does and should have authority at school and with regards to school activities. A kid bringing a gun to school is within that purview.
A kid bringing a gun into a movie theater is not the schools business, it is the courts business. So to answer your question with a question, why do we need school administrators to do the job our constitution sets up the judicial system for? We have rights, like that of self incrimination in the judicial system, but no such right in the school judicial system. Quite simply, it is none of the schools business what happens outside of school.
Schools have a hard enough time educating our youth. When they get that perfect, then we can talk about how they can perfect our constitutionally monitored justice system.
Pray not for lighter burdens, but for stronger backs.
Posts: 2965 | Location: il | Registered: November 15, 2006
Soldiers fight for the rights spelled out in the Constitution. These rights cannot be suspended in the case of terrorists. Our rights were eroding when the last administration deemed it OK to wiretap without court orders, to suspend habeous corpus, deem people illegal combatantsa and jail them without representation. Our rights were indeed eroding, and we let it happen until the Country wiseley voted to change our course. Not to mention condoning torture. That was all a subversion of the Constitution so many have bravely fought and died for.
Our legal system has been based on better 100 guilty go free than one innocent man be executed. We have gotten away from that due to fear of the bogeyman terrorist in the shopping mall.
Schools are part of the community. They are there to teach, not only reading writing and 'rithmatic, but how to socialize and become productive members of society. Sports are supposed to teach life lessons, they are not a vocational school. The community pays taxes for schools, and schools have an obligation to do the best job of educating they can.
Many have said, the punished players learn lessons. Yes they do. For actions, there are consequences.
In my opinion, playing on a sports team is a privelege, not a right. The state has a mandate "for the general welfare" to educate kids in studies. Their task has broadened, but not to where sports is a right.
I don't think school boards and politicians stole our rights while we slept. I think the community wanted schools to do more than basic math english and science. My wife has been active as soon as we had children to have input in the schools through PTA and school boards. The people that care get involved. These things develope over time.
Children live in the community and are part of the community. So are the schools and the police and fire departments. They all work together and are connected to create the fine communities we live in, and to make this Country the greatest on the planet.
If kids don't follow the rules, many parts of the community get involved. The police may send the kid to government rehab center or a diciplinary school. Teh scool may enforce their codes of conduct. Courts get involved and it affects if and when kids return to scholls and whether there are restricted acitvities. It is not as simple as, he broke the law, call the police. You will all hate this but, It takes a village. The Secretary of State had a point.
Posts: 744 | Location: north suburbs | Registered: September 26, 2005
The facts of the individual case are now known and I fear that leaving this thread open would serve no further useful purpose.
Does that quote look familiar?
Even though freedom of speech is a right granted to US citizens, you choose to lock the thread. Even though no laws were broken, no personal attacks were made against anyone, however you rightfully did it to prevent negative postings directed at the young man or family, which I thought was a good idea.
As a moderator, you have been given the job of determining what falls within the rules of this site and what crosses the rules. When you close a topic I understand that what was posted must not of been within the guidelines set forth.
We understand that and have no choice but to accept the decision you have made to close a topic where people are exercising their freedom of speech. No Problem
If a young man plays on a team, he will be held to a certain set of rules that govern that team or organization. Every child is afforded an education, protected by Law. Where have you ever seen a law that affords every kid the right to be a member of a sports team. Until then, guidelines will be in place that people (not just the player's) will have to adhere to.
Posts: 211 | Location: Wheaton | Registered: January 18, 2004