Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
quote: I think Orel Hershiser had the best advice for young pitchers. He said no curveballs until 16 or older.
Based on what research?
* Impossible is just a high degree of difficulty *
|
| |
| Posts: 4621 | Location: Mid-Atlantic | Registered: October 29, 2007 |    |
|
Member
|
I don't think there is a sure right or wrong about this debate.
When my son was in LL, curves were considered risky, as were high pitch counts. His LL coach played it safe with all his pitchers and allowed no curves and kept low pitch counts (50-60). We didn't win the championships, but I thank him for this. This developed more pitchers and developed the other players defensively as more balls were put in play.
From 13-15, my son was small and a good position player, so his coaches and I erred on the side of caution with his pitching and continued the same no curves, low pitch counts. I also was not confident that he would be taught the right way to throw the curve, and I didn't want to be that helicopter parent that coaches their son from the stands. In HS, I let the coaches teach him a curve. After throwing the curve for two years, his scouting report says that his curve is his best pitch, a strong out pitch with great depth and downward break.
My point is that he didn't need to throw the curve at 12 years old for it to become his best pitch. Maybe there are kids that are getting away with throwing curves at a young age, but it wasn't worth the risk to me. Pitching success at an early age can also lead to high pitch counts and overuse on teams where winning becomes too important.
There will be new studies that may have different results than the studies we are looking at now. Look at the rules for pregnant women. Every child we had, the rules changed due to the latest studies. There have been tons of healthy babies born to smoking or drinking mothers, but we don't encourage pregant women to do these things. We weigh the risk, and make a decision.
The OP has a point, about what is the next level. Maybe the risk of curves at a young age outweighs the long odds of continuing to play beyond high school. For a pitcher only, the decision may be different than a player that has a future as a hitter and position player.
|
| |
| Posts: 264 | Location: California | Registered: March 20, 2008 |    |
|
Member
|
4 seamer,quote: Alright,seriously, is 13 too young to throw 10 or so curveballs per game? Who REALLY abused his arm more?
Then Let’s get real serious here! Depends? How many is the number? The youth injury rates have gone up 5 fold in ten years. This is why when prestigious firms like ASMI gets it wrong with every recommendation because they promote over-use as a culprit instead of the mechanics it shows their real competence but they are learning and they will eventually discover it also. If your mechanics are injury free you can only suffer from diminished capacity and in human beings that is huge. Then there are only bone length issues. At biologically aged 10 YO your sons elbow does not even show up on and X-Ray. At biologically aged 11 YO your sons elbow starts to show up as a dime sized. At biologically aged 12 YO your son’s elbow becomes a quarters size. At biologically aged 13 YO your sons elbow finally solidifies where you can see it on an x-ray. Your son’s elbow is basically underdeveloped soft tissue in a vulnerable time frame. Do you know your son’s biological age?!! This means your sons Elbow is going through a massive growth change right at this time and if he ballisticly crashes his upper arm with his lower arm from over extension from hard supination he will put his elbow at risk for cartilage deformation that turns into bone chips later, he will put all the growth plates in the elbow area at risk of premature closure and catistrophic failure!, he will deform the bone at the crashing points (capitilum) so that he will lose extension range of motion and worse, he will be more susceptible to avulsions from his muscles have to eccentrically contract to stop the crashing from happening which causes problems in the shoulder, I can go on and on. Supination (thumb up drive and finish) causes these problems!! The stress levels for these pitches are 1. Supinated Cutter. Fastball with the most stress. 2. Supinated Slider. You should see the injury ratios go up in colleges and pros when these two pitches are finally taught. 3. Supinated curve while less stressful still ballisticly crashes your sons elbow together!!!! In the middle 1960's, Dr. Joel Adams of San Bernadino, CA conducted the only credible research into the subject using x-ray analysis on over 600 youth baseball players. He found that ninety-five percent of the pitchers in his study had suffered irreparable damage to their pitching arms. Not to the point that most pitchers could not still pitch, but to the point that premature closure permanently shortened the bones of their throwing arms and perturbed and deformed All of them to some degree and many to totality. Dr Marshall who was involved with this was the first to make this call out to the baseball world about supination and the traditionally taught curve. Teach your sons and daughters to pronate (thumb down drive and release) so that their arm hinges and they will then only suffer from slight bone and ligament stress. If you want a curve there is a two safe way ‘s to throw a curve pronated drive and release!! The pronated thumb slip curve (very very fun!)and the Marshall pronated curve.
|
| |
| Posts: 182 | Location: SoCal | Registered: February 18, 2008 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
quote: The OP has a point, about what is the next level. Maybe the risk of curves at a young age outweighs the long odds of continuing to play beyond high school.
There was a kid from Saugus, MA in the LLWS a few years ago freaking people out with how many curves he was throwing. The response was baseball was a secondary sport to him. When the LLWS was over he was done playing organized baseball.
* Impossible is just a high degree of difficulty *
|
| |
| Posts: 4621 | Location: Mid-Atlantic | Registered: October 29, 2007 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
quote: This is why when prestigious firms like ASMI gets it wrong
And of course Dr Mike Marshall is God's gift to the universe and has everything right while Hall of Fame pitchers have been pitching incorrectly for one hundred years. If the word Nym@n is banned from this site, I nominate the word Marshall. It's not Marshall's ideas that annoy me. It's the interjection and ruination of every thread where his culties get involved.
* Impossible is just a high degree of difficulty *
|
| |
| Posts: 4621 | Location: Mid-Atlantic | Registered: October 29, 2007 |    |
|
Member
|
quote: In the middle 1960's, Dr. Joel Adams of San Bernadino, CA conducted the only credible research into the subject using x-ray analysis on over 600 youth baseball players.
Did we even have x-ray technology in the 1960's. (joking) It sort of looks like you had to search back 45 years to find a study that supported your argument here. Not saying your right or wrong, but I would think you could find a more recent study.
|
| |
| Posts: 264 | Location: California | Registered: March 20, 2008 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
quote: Originally posted by Blprkfrnks: I don't think there is a sure right or wrong about this debate.
When my son was in LL, curves were considered risky, as were high pitch counts. His LL coach played it safe with all his pitchers and allowed no curves and kept low pitch counts (50-60). We didn't win the championships, but I thank him for this. This developed more pitchers and developed the other players defensively as more balls were put in play.
From 13-15, my son was small and a good position player, so his coaches and I erred on the side of caution with his pitching and continued the same no curves, low pitch counts. I also was not confident that he would be taught the right way to throw the curve, and I didn't want to be that helicopter parent that coaches their son from the stands. In HS, I let the coaches teach him a curve. After throwing the curve for two years, his scouting report says that his curve is his best pitch, a strong out pitch with great depth and downward break.
My point is that he didn't need to throw the curve at 12 years old for it to become his best pitch. Maybe there are kids that are getting away with throwing curves at a young age, but it wasn't worth the risk to me. Pitching success at an early age can also lead to high pitch counts and overuse on teams where winning becomes too important.
There will be new studies that may have different results than the studies we are looking at now. Look at the rules for pregnant women. Every child we had, the rules changed due to the latest studies. There have been tons of healthy babies born to smoking or drinking mothers, but we don't encourage pregant women to do these things. We weigh the risk, and make a decision.
The OP has a point, about what is the next level. Maybe the risk of curves at a young age outweighs the long odds of continuing to play beyond high school. For a pitcher only, the decision may be different than a player that has a future as a hitter and position player.
Outstanding post. You seem more concerned with your son's development than his stats and that is the way it ought to be imho. RJM - Hershiser seems like a reputable source to me and his logic made sense to me. He said he developed that notion from Walter Alston who also seems like a reputable source to me. hokione's logic makes sense to me as well. Look, people are entitlted to their opinions. If you think young players ought to be throwing curves then so be it - I could care less what your research tells you. I would rather be safe than sorry. As some of the posts have pointed out, you may be robbing them of the chance to properly develop their fastballs. The fastball will always be the most important pitch in baseball imho. Why do you think the guys who get drafted the highest each year have the best fastballs?
|
| |
| Posts: 6722 | Location: Cleveland, Ohio | Registered: December 22, 2004 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
quote: In the middle 1960's, Dr. Joel Adams of San Bernadino, CA conducted the only credible research into the subject using x-ray analysis on over 600 youth baseball players. He found that ninety-five percent of the pitchers in his study had suffered irreparable damage to their pitching arms.
In 1782 a study conducted by a group of Native American shamen and mages found that using juniper plants ground into a juicy pile it could be used to cure ingrown toenails. Also, if applied to the elbow then it can help the recovery time of throwing spears. Another study conducted in 1238 by a group of wizards found that hog's tooth ground into a powder and mixed with wolfsbane would create a cream that could cure halitosis - or as they called it back then "devil's breath" because anything that smelled that bad had to come from the devil. There are some really great scientific studies from way back when. I really like the one where leeches could suck the evil out of a person. That alone probably revolutionized the world of medicine more than anything.
When life hands you gators - make Gatorade
|
| |
| Posts: 2268 | Location: Started in WV - then to KY - now in NC | Registered: May 12, 2006 |    |
|
Member
|
quote: Originally posted by TRhit: Bobblehead
I respectfully disagree
Speaking as a hitters dad to a pitchers dad the toughest pitch for a good hitter is the slider--
i just wanted to say i disagree unless the guy throws 100 mph. otherwise you have time to see the "dot" that forms on a conventional slider and is absolutely obvious and the hitter
|
| |
| Posts: 246 | Location: northeast | Registered: April 29, 2006 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
quote: Hershiser seems like a reputable source to me and his logic made sense to me. He said he developed that notion from Walter Alston who also seems like a reputable source to me.
What makes Orel Hershiser and Walter Alston experts on youth baseball? What evidence did they provide to validate their opinions on youth baseball? Otherwise it's no more of an opinion than anyone elses. We could even call it a wild guess. And I'll bet there are many youth coaches who have done more homework on youth pitching than Hershiser and Alston. I'm not saying I know more about pitching than Hershiser and Alston. But I'll bet I've done a lot more research and talked or exchanged emails with experts on youth sports than Hershiser and Alston. I'll take legitmate advice from respected members of this board before taking it from them.
* Impossible is just a high degree of difficulty *
|
| |
| Posts: 4621 | Location: Mid-Atlantic | Registered: October 29, 2007 |    |
|
Member
|
RJM,Are you still reading my posts? I warned you before that you have the right to bypass them! Breath. quote: “If the word Nym@n is banned from this site”
Is this true? How did you get that done? Here let me see, *****? quote: “I nominate the word Marshall”
Then I will use Dr.MM quote: “It's not Marshall's ideas that annoy me.”
Do vexed people recognize their vexism? quote: “It's the interjection and ruination of every thread”
I think that’s only for you and a few others? quote: “where his culties get involved.”
We are cool aid drinkers not Cultists and we use sugar not strychnine. Breath! Blprkfrnks,quote: “It sort of looks like you had to search back 45 years to find a study that supported your argument here.”
All kinesiological finding since support the merits of the research and have been used in the development in the football throw, racket drive (tennis and badminton), javelin and other overhead projection which they all incorporate pronation into their pedagogy! Baseball is the only traditional sport to not take advantage of the information fully. quote: “Not saying your right or wrong, but I would think you could find a more recent study.”
I would love to see the baseball community (MLB and Colleges) pay for an actual combined effort to replicate the original discovery and corrective recommendations. Unfortunately the Org’s that people look up to refuse to recognize the research because they have been selling their injurious product for so long they have become intransigent.
|
| |
| Posts: 182 | Location: SoCal | Registered: February 18, 2008 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Copyright 1998-2008 High School Baseball Web
|