Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
quote: I'm no ump...so as a member of the peanut gallery, I call the runner out.
thank goodness you have us.......  score the run on the obstruction.....
|
| |
| Posts: 1914 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: January 07, 2003 |    |
|
Member
|
quote: Originally posted by S. Abrams: Interesting...even though the he was in the act of catching the ball but mishandled it. I guess the new ruling (what about the train wreck where the catcher steps into the runners path trying to catch an errant throw)stems solely on possession, not the fact the catcher was in the correct spot to field the throw. 3 feet up the line isn't far at all...where does avoiding contact by the runner play onto this.
What's the call if the catcher catches the ball but looses it from contact with the runner during the slide, then picks the ball up and tags the runner? Does the fact he dropped the ball cause an obstruction call? Where does judgment from the ump factor in or is that out of the equation under the new ruling?
The runner cannot contact the catcher illegally. That hasn't changed. But if the fielder (without the ball) does anything to hinder the baserunner, it is obstruction. Malicious contact (crashing the catcher even if he was blocking the plate or baseline without the ball) supersedes obstruction. In your second sitch, it would not be OBS unless the runner resumed his quest for the plate and the catcher hindered him before picking up the ball. The ball coming loose from legal contact with the catcher legally blocking the plate does not cause OBS.
|
| |
| Posts: 369 | Location: Long Island, NY | Registered: December 19, 2007 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Copyright 1998-2008 High School Baseball Web
|