Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
Not trying to ruffle feathers here, just a question BUT... quote: I agree that you have to have a good FB to be drafted, but you don't have to have a major league FB to be effective in HS. In many cases you just have to throw hard
. quote: All I care about is whether a guy can get hitters out, which means I have a great deal of respect for "soft tossers" like...
- Maddux - Glavine - Suppan - Moyer - Wakefield
What I am looking for are the guys who actually know how to pitch Last I knew Moyer and Wakefield never had a good FB, aren't you contradicting yourself when you swing from one side of the pendulum to the other so quickly? You go from having a good FB to going to guys who can simply just get an out. I do agree that many scouts won't look at guys without a solid FB, there are a few of them who do actually care about just getting outs, but they are few and far between. Just trying to understand a few things
-------------------------------------------------- I never threw an illegal pitch. The trouble is, once in a while I toss one that ain't never been seen by this generation
|
| |
| Posts: 1034 | Location: London, Ontario, Canada | Registered: December 31, 2003 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer
|
quote: Originally posted by redbird5: Once agin you are wrong. I don't like you because you obviously don't know what you are talking about and then come on the board claiming to scout for a MLB team. I don't deal with liars and stupidity very well.
Listen. You can disagree with me all you want, but DO NOT call me a liar. Like it or not, I AM working with a team cross-checking pitchers for potential mechanical problems. The reason I can't say who it is is because I am obviously controversial and I haven't yet completely proven myself to them. quote: Originally posted by redbird5: You don't know where you said anything to the contrary? How does a kid with a plus FB in HS make it to the MLB without developing secondary pitches? Would success in the minors constitute learning to pitch?
He probably won't, and I never said anything to the contrary. What I said is that there's more to pitching than just blowing people away with a hard fastball. The problem with guys who have overwhelming fastballs in HS is that they often never actually learn to pitch, and never have to develop those secondary pitches, and then have problems in college, the minors, or the big leagues when they face better hitters. If you studied the history of baseball, you will find that it is littered with the stories of guys like Todd Van Poppel and Steve Dalkowski who had great fastballs but who couldn't survive in the show because they couldn't adapt.
|
| |
| Posts: 1096 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: March 06, 2006 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer
|
quote: Originally posted by Doc_K: Last I knew Moyer and Wakefield never had a good FB, aren't you contradicting yourself when you swing from one side of the pendulum to the other so quickly? You go from having a good FB to going to guys who can simply just get an out.
I don't know Moyer's history, but I know that Wakefield is a converted third baseman. What I am trying to figure out is how to identify the guys like Moyer and Wakefield (and John Tudor) who may not have overwhelming stuff but who actually know how to pitch, who know how to get guys out, and who could make it in the show. Right now those guys are pretty much ignored by the scouting establishment and have to make it to the big leagues by first pitching in an independent league. Only then do they start to catch the attention of scouts.
|
| |
| Posts: 1096 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: March 06, 2006 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Copyright 1998-2008 High School Baseball Web
|