Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
quote: Originally posted by swingbuilder: hahaha....short A is rookie ball. Mrs. TPM.
I don't know any player in short season A ball that considers themselves to be in 'rookie' ball, and the MiLB site identifies them as totally different levels : AAA, AA, Class A (advanced), Class A, Class A (short season), and Rookie. So technically, short season A ball is NOT rookie ball.
Mary Ann * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * "The Lord Himself goes before you and will be with you; He will never leave you nor forsake you. Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged." Deuteronomy 31:8 [8/21/08]
|
| |
| Posts: 3937 | Location: Somewhere out there beneath the pale moonlight ... | Registered: January 02, 2003 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
If there weren't a league designation in MiLB of Rookie, sb, you would be correct insofar as a first-year player is called a "rookie". However, as FBM has pointed out, Short Season is a separate league and designation within the system, and any player transferred from SS to Rookie would, indeed, know he had been demoted. Not technicality; reality.
"They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance." --- Terry Pratchett
|
| |
| Posts: 3604 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: December 30, 2002 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
You all make good points, technically swingbuilder is correct, and IMO Orlando and FBM are also correct. Player destinations are different for every player on different teams and my understanding is according to age and ability. A first year player is definetly a rookie. According to the question asked my answer was based upon the normal path for MOST HS players, unless very high picks, get assigned rookie complex ball then to rookie low A. MOST college players head to ss, low A or high A. A lot depends on the organizations needs as well. Swingbuilder, is that better. 
|
| |
| Posts: 10704 | Location: South Florida | Registered: July 28, 2003 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
Golly gee whiz, SWINGBUILDER, I do know all that; I have a very keen grasp of the obvious. And I can't tell you how grateful I am for the primer on your terminology. Really. I can't.
"They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance." --- Terry Pratchett
|
| |
| Posts: 3604 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: December 30, 2002 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
quote: Originally posted by swingbuilder: Short season is a large majority of players that remain in "extended spring training". Know what that is, ORLANDO?
SB, that isn't correct, at all, for the short season A ball leagues like the NY/PENN and the NWL. It is more true for the short season Rookie leagues like the Pioneer and Applachian. To say the majority of players in the NY/PENN and NWL came from Extended just isn't right. The rosters in those two leagues are largely made from the draft and then combined with some Latin players in extended who are young and did not get an assignment in April. You might have up to and additional 3 that came through the draft in prior years who were in extended, but 3 would be a lot. To say a "large majority" from extended make up the rosters in the short season NY/PENN and NWL isn't supported by looking at the rosters and how they are almost always made up of 20-23 or so players from that years draft and/or younger Latin players ranked highly within an organization.
'You don't have to be a great player to play in the major leagues, you've got to be a good one every day.'
|
| |
| Posts: 2051 | Location: ca | Registered: February 11, 2003 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
quote: The New York Penn League is a short season league. Its also "rookie ball" when we designate "NO PLAYER THAT HAS TO PLAY TWO YEARS OF ROOKIE BALL"
SB, in response to whether you said the NY/Penn league was short season, you did... and it is so it looks like we agree on both. 
'You don't have to be a great player to play in the major leagues, you've got to be a good one every day.'
|
| |
| Posts: 2051 | Location: ca | Registered: February 11, 2003 |    |
|
Member
|
quote: SB, that isn't correct, at all, for the short season A ball leagues like the NY/PENN and the NWL. It is more true for the short season Rookie leagues like the Pioneer and Applachian. To say the majority of players in the NY/PENN and NWL came from Extended just isn't right.
This is your quote...I never said the above. you did. What I said was this..... quote: Short season is a large majority of players that remain in "extended spring training".
A majority of players in ALL of the short season leagues are made up of players that were in extended spring training. I wasn't specific to the NWL or the Penn league.
|
| |
| Posts: 189 | Location: USA | Registered: July 13, 2006 |    |
|
HSBBWeb Old Timer

|
I don't know if you are talking about a "majority" which is where you are now, or a "large majority" which is where you were before. They mean something different to me by a "large" factor. I think I have a decent grasp of the system and process, certainly enough to know that, absent an injury, being left in extended, at the end of Spring Training, at any stage in the process, means you can be playing for your baseball life. If you are repeating a level, for other than injury reasons, you also can be competing for your baseball life. If get get moved down a level, for other than injury reasons, you can be competing for your baseball life. If you are injured, you are competing for your baseball life, but in a very different way.
'You don't have to be a great player to play in the major leagues, you've got to be a good one every day.'
|
| |
| Posts: 2051 | Location: ca | Registered: February 11, 2003 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Copyright 1998-2008 High School Baseball Web
|