It's a top academic school in a great area. It's a bottom feeder in the Big East. The coach has been there ten years with a .333 winning percentage. His profile highlights back to back 25 win (losing) seasons. When a coach can lose and keep his job this long I think the athletic department isn't committed to winning baseball. It could be they're not giving him the tools to win.
* Live fully, enjoy every moment, and let go of the petty problems, mostly of our own invention, which seek to destroy the spirit. * - a good friend, the late Brad Perkins of KIRO
Posts: 1697 | Location: Mid-Atlantic | Registered: October 29, 2007
Coach Wilk told us that the school was starting to fund scholarships as of the 2007-8 school year, and that up to that point they treated baseball as if they were an Ivy. That, of course, explains why they were not competitive in the Big East.
He said in 07-08 he had nine schollys to give and would be fully funded the next year. Should help the program rise out of the perennial cellar.
Coach Wilk told us that the school was starting to fund scholarships as of the 2007-8 school year, and that up to that point they treated baseball as if they were an Ivy. That, of course, explains why they were not competitive in the Big East.
I guess this would fall under not being given the tools to win. They recruited six players for incoming '12 class. There are now thirty rostered players. It looks like good seats are still available.
* Live fully, enjoy every moment, and let go of the petty problems, mostly of our own invention, which seek to destroy the spirit. * - a good friend, the late Brad Perkins of KIRO
Posts: 1697 | Location: Mid-Atlantic | Registered: October 29, 2007
There is no way GTown will ever compete in the Big East in baseball. It is beneath club LAX in order of priority. GTown, which is a relatively unattractive, vertical campus (with no natural grass except in two small cemeteries), has no baseball field. The on-campus practice facility consists of three outdoor cages and the adjacent s****r fields. Shirley Povich is a decent HS field--it is not of Div I quality. GTown cares about baseball about as much as Syracuse does (which, of course, is not at all).
Posts: 175 | Location: Virginia | Registered: April 04, 2008
Georgetown clearly needs a greater commitment to baseball. Maybe this is coming, maybe it isn't.
But two things:
1. Shirley Povich is much, much better than you describe and better than many D1 fields I have seen across the country.
2. Georgetown has a spectacular campus. Never have I heard it described as you have. At a minimum, there is grass and trees and quadrangles and all sorts of classic college architecture across the campus.
Posts: 1120 | Location: Phoenix AZ | Registered: December 26, 2002
isaacvanwart; the lack of sophistication in your commentary amazes me. The campus is beautiful - Healy Hall is a landmark recognized world round, and Copley and White Gravenor nearly are. And Healy and Copley lawns are right inside the Healy Gates.
There may not be a lot of grass, but tell, me where in Georgetown IS there a lot of grass? Yes, it plays baseball off campus, but the field is nice. It may not be a baseball school yet, but Wilk is helping it to move up the ladder.
Oh, and PS, there is only one cemetary on the campus - it is for all of the jesuit priests, should they so desire.
Posts: 227 | Location: somewhere over the rainbow | Registered: February 27, 2007
Let's just say, to keep it clean, that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." To me, GTown's campus is distinctly urban, vertical, and concrete. I never said it lacked completely in redeeming qualities. There are several beautiful buildings, as you have described. But the hodgepodge of architectural styles, the grossly vertical nature of the architecture, and the almost complete lack of lawns and other green spaces is alarmingly ugly. As for the cemeteries, if it is but one cemetery, it is on two levels and is separated by substantial areas of asphalt and concrete, not to mention about 100 vertical feet.
Shirley Povich is a good municipal field. The setting is great, the stands are nice, and the field appears to be well maintained. But it is not so good for the players. Bounces at 3B are as bad as any I have ever seen, and several areas of both the infield and outfield are simply rough. Don't get me wrong, it is nice that GTown has access to a decent field (even if 30 minutes away), particularly since its on campus facilities are on par with those of a poor Junior High School.
GTown has a great reputation for academics, and Big John brought the Hoyas to some measure of basketball success as the game changed in the 80s. But GTown is not all things to all people. I happen to be a person not overly taken with GTown. I certainly would never encourage a good baseball player to go there to play baseball. Lord no. It is a joke. I don't put a whole lot of stock in their subpar football program (good grief, play Div I and compete), either. If a kid is a stud basketball player and wants to be in D.C. on an urban, vertical, concrete campus, GTown would be great.
Final note--I have personally been on two dozen college campuses that are markedly nicer (at least in my view) than GTown's.
Posts: 175 | Location: Virginia | Registered: April 04, 2008
The only building that I find ugly is the library. It is supposed to be a modern architectural interpretation/translation of Healy, and it is also a Vietnam War Memorial. There are plans in the works to re-vamp it. Healy, Copley and WG are gothic style. All other buildings are red brick - yes they may be in different architectural modes. Other buildings are generally 4 stories tall from ground level (library has 2 floors below Healy lawn ground level, Harbin is 9 but not from ground level). The university is built up hill (and so there are several different levels to the campus) and along the Potomac. The only cemetery is one level and sits between Copley and the ICC. Leo's (dining hall) has huge ceiling to floor windows overlooking the Potomac. The new MSB building, being built adjacent to Leavy, is stunning.
GU is the oldest Jesuit university in our country, with buildings pre-dating the civil war, and so the buildings are necessarily eclectic, having been built during many different eras in US history.
I have been on many campuses also. Yes, there are many lovely college campuses in our country - GU is one of them. In fact, perhaps one of the most beautiful, Princeton, is extremely ecletic, having many, many different styles of architecture.
Posts: 227 | Location: somewhere over the rainbow | Registered: February 27, 2007
To say that you would never advise a good baseball player to attend Georgetown is a little extreme. There are a lot of baseball players that also have a solid academic background. How many schools in the country have a top 20 academic reputation and play in a conference that have multiple ranked teams? For all of those "good" baseball players that cannot get significant innings or significant at-bats at a Vanderbilt or Stanford, G-town seems like the perfect situation... great competition and great athletics.
Posts: 3 | Location: Philadelphia | Registered: November 28, 2008
Okay, to each his own. As for me, or if I had the power to grant my son a school to attend, for academics + opportunity + beauty + baseball, before GTown I would list:
All Ivies All ACC schools All PAC Ten schools All Big Ten schools All Big 12 schools All SEC schools A few other select schools (several SOCON/Big South/Conf USA schools plus Miami of Ohio) Several within the Big East (ND, St. John's, Univ of Cincinnati)
GTown is fine, but for a balance of what I would look for, or I would encourage my son to look for, GTown is way down the list.
By the way, it may be one cemetery, it may be two, but there are two levels of cemetery at GTown. One is directly above the other, by about 100 feet. Unless GTown just enjoys putting headstones into the only two bits of greenspace on campus for the fun of it.
And call it eclectic if you want. It may be that, but it is, to me, less aesthetically pleasing than dozens of campuses in America.
Posts: 175 | Location: Virginia | Registered: April 04, 2008
The second cemetery to which you refer is not on the Georgetown campus, it simply abuts the campus, and I do not believe it is affiliated in anyway with the school (but in order to confirm that I would have to check with my own personal college co-ed University tour guide (smile)). And your focus here seems to have blinded you as to the various other greenery at the school (i.e. have you entered the school through Healy Gates - what do you call the stuff on either side?) As for the remainder of your comments, well, you are entitled to your opinion, no matter how unfounded I believe them to be.
Posts: 227 | Location: somewhere over the rainbow | Registered: February 27, 2007
The "upper" cemetery is directly accessible from the campus.
Sure, there are a few blades of grass here and there, but from my perspective, "They paved paradise, and put up a parking lot."
I'd take the lowliest school in the Pac 10 (possibly, Washington State or Arizona or Washington?) over GTown. Same with all the others on my list. There is more than enough foundation to support my view. A school that cannot field a competitive team in Bowl Championship Subdivision football or a competitive team in the Big East in baseball is not a fully-balanced major university. GTown is a good academic institution (no better, and in many cases, not as good as, those on my list, above). It falls down in comparison due to the non-academic, quality of life factors.
But this thread started out about baseball--GTown baseball is many years and a great commitment away from ever fielding a competitive baseball team.
Posts: 175 | Location: Virginia | Registered: April 04, 2008